As global inequality widens and billionaire philanthropy continues to shape international development, Bill Gates is making his final moves. In an interview with the Financial Times, the Microsoft co-founder sharply criticized Elon Musk for recent cuts to U.S. foreign aid, which Gates argues will have immediate and devastating consequences for the world’s poorest populations. The remarks come as Gates announces a timeline to donate his remaining fortune and wind down the Gates Foundation by 2045.
See also: Tesla Engineer Says Elon Musk Threatened to Deport Her Team for Reporting a Brake Hazard
Bill Gates Criticizes Elon Musk’s Foreign Aid Cuts
Gates’s comments focused on the February shutdown of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), carried out under Musk’s newly established Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The agency’s abrupt closure halted a wide range of global health programs, including HIV prevention, vaccine delivery, and malaria control.
“The picture of the world’s richest man killing the world’s poorest children is not a pretty one,” Gates told the Financial Times. “I’d love for him to go in and meet the children that have now been infected with HIV because he cut that money.”
While USAID’s role in global health has long been central to U.S. foreign policy, its sudden dismantling has left many public health experts warning of increased disease transmission and the erosion of long-term progress. According to data from UNAIDS, U.S. foreign aid has supported millions of individuals living with HIV, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, where disruptions in access to antiretroviral therapy can have fatal consequences.
Musk and DOGE have not publicly responded to Gates’s accusations. Last month, Musk announced he would reduce his role in the department following disappointing first-quarter earnings at Tesla.
See also: Tesla Can’t Keep It Together—Literally, and Recalls Thousands of Cybertrucks
The Gates Foundation’s Accelerated Wind-Down
Alongside his critique of Musk, Gates outlined the future of his philanthropic work. In a blog post published Thursday, he revealed that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation will cease operations on December 31, 2045, a full decade earlier than originally planned. The move is part of a larger initiative to donate his remaining fortune—estimated at $107 billion—within the next 20 years.
“People will say a lot of things about me when I die,” Gates wrote, “but I am determined that ‘he died rich’ will not be one of them.”
Since its founding in 2000, the Gates Foundation has spent more than $100 billion on global health, education, and poverty alleviation. Gates now expects the foundation to distribute another $200 billion over the next two decades, fueled by the endowment and his personal donations.
He also used the announcement to advocate for progressive tax reform, including higher estate and inheritance taxes, arguing that “extreme wealth should be taxed—before and after death.”
See also: Elon Musk’s Poll Numbers Crash Harder Than a Tesla on Autopilot
Two Visions of Philanthropy, Public Policy, and Power
The sharp contrast between Gates and Musk highlights a deeper philosophical divide about wealth, responsibility, and the role of private individuals in shaping public systems. Gates’s philanthropic model—global in scope, methodical in execution—relies on close partnerships with governments and international agencies. Musk’s governance approach, by contrast, has emphasized disruption, deregulation, and cost-cutting.
A recent analysis by The Atlantic questioned the long-term impact of DOGE’s claimed $165 billion in savings, citing independent audits suggesting the actual figure may be closer to $2 billion. Meanwhile, a federal court temporarily blocked the agency’s further dismantling of international aid programs, citing potential violations of constitutional and international obligations.
See also: Elon Musk, Ketamine, and the Brain: How the Drug Might Influence His Behavior
When Private Wealth Shapes Public Outcomes
As Bill Gates prepares to exit the world of big philanthropy, his final message is both a challenge and a critique: the immense resources held by billionaires carry real consequences—and moral weight. His direct condemnation of Elon Musk underscores that, in an era where private actors wield enormous public influence, how that power is used—or withheld—can alter the trajectory of millions of lives.
