When the Trump administration began slashing scientific funding earlier this year, the headlines focused on job losses, shuttered programs, and university backlash. But left out of the conversation? The animals. Thousands of them. Mice, rats, even monkeys—bred, studied, and cared for under the promise of advancing public health—are now being euthanized mid-study as research programs vanish overnight.
It’s not just cruel. It’s wasteful, dangerous, and in some cases, irreversible.
See also: No, Scientists Didn’t Resurrect the Dire Wolf — But What They Did Do Is Even Weirder
What Trump’s Budget Cuts Are Doing to Research Labs Across the U.S.
In April, more than 900 lab animals were left behind when scientists at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health in West Virginia were abruptly terminated and locked out of their own building. Two-thirds of the animals were eventually rehomed to university labs. The remaining 300 were euthanized. Their studies—unfinished. Their data—lost.
This isn’t an isolated incident. Researchers across the country are scrambling as the Trump administration freezes grants, dismantles programs, and proposes caps that would gut indirect funding—money that often pays for animal care, facility upkeep, and technician salaries. Without it, institutions that rely on animal models can’t function. And lab animals? They’re the first to pay the price.
See also: Ozempic and Eating Disorders: Miracle Drug or Dangerous Trigger?
What scientists are saying: heartbreak, frustration, and zero closure
“We don’t take using animals lightly,” said Kyle Mandler, a toxicologist whose mice were euthanized. “The fact that their lives and sacrifice will just be a complete waste is equal parts depressing and infuriating.”
That sentiment echoes across interviews with former researchers—many of whom spoke anonymously for fear of retaliation. It’s not just the science that’s being halted. It’s years of ethical vetting, planning, and care—all gone, overnight.
And for many lab animals, it’s a worst-case scenario: death with no scientific purpose.
See also: Elon Musk, Ketamine, and the Brain: How the Drug Might Influence His Behavior
The moral dilemma: better dead than studied?
Some animal rights activists see this moment as a dark silver lining. If federal labs are being downsized, and animals are being spared experimentation, maybe that’s a net good. But even they admit it’s complicated.
“For a lot of these animals, being euthanized before being experimented on is probably a best-case scenario,” said Justin Goodman of the White Coat Waste Project.
But researchers argue that mass culling—especially when data goes uncollected and lives go undocumented—is the worst of both worlds: unnecessary death and no scientific gain.
“We’re not quite at the point where we can replace all animal testing,” said Naomi Charalambakis of Americans for Medical Progress. “We want to get there—but not like this.”
See also: (VIDEO): Scientists Capture the First-Ever Footage of a Live Colossal Squid in the Wild
Why they can’t just “set them free”
Some of the animals could be rehomed or transferred to sanctuaries. But not all. Many have been exposed to chemicals, pathogens, or are genetically modified in ways that make them unsuited for life outside the lab. And the sheer volume of displaced animals is overwhelming the limited number of facilities equipped to care for them.
At the Washington National Primate Research Center, a proposed funding cap could cut $5 million a year. That would force a downsizing of its monkey colony—and if no homes can be found, euthanasia may be the only option.
“It’s a worst-case scenario,” said one director. “Even though none of us likes to think about it or have to talk about it, it could happen.”
See also: Is There Life Beyond Earth? Astronomers Detect Potential Sign of Life on Distant Planet
A brutal wake-up call for biomedical research
Yes, the U.S. is slowly moving toward alternatives: “organs on chips,” AI simulations, and cell-based models show real promise. The FDA has already announced plans to reduce animal testing requirements. But most experts agree: we’re not there yet. Some studies still require animal models—especially for long-term, multi-system effects.
The key issue isn’t whether we should end animal testing—it’s how. Abrupt funding cuts, mass firings, and unregulated closures aren’t a transition plan. They’re a collapse.
“I don’t think it’s OK to cull millions of animals from research,” said Dr. Paul Locke of Johns Hopkins. “I don’t think that’s societally acceptable. I don’t think it’s scientifically acceptable.”
See also: Is ChatGPT Conscious? Gen Z Thinks So—and They’re Kind of Serious About It
The quiet fallout—and why no one’s talking
Researchers are afraid to speak. Animal facilities won’t comment. Even institutions that pride themselves on transparency have gone dark. Some fear backlash from animal rights activists. Others fear retaliation from the Trump administration. But mostly, they’re just overwhelmed.
“It’s a parade of horribles,” said one expert. “And there’s no good way out.”
Without national oversight or a unified response plan, decisions about what happens to thousands of lab animals are being made ad hoc—driven by individual ethics, institutional panic, or, in some cases, complete indifference.
See also: This Man Sent an AI Lawyer to Argue His Case in Court—It Didn’t Go Well
A Quiet, Messy End to Years of Work
There’s no easy way to talk about animal testing—or how to stop relying on it. But what’s happening now isn’t a transition. It’s a collapse. The Trump administration’s cuts have left research unfinished, careers upended, and hundreds of animals euthanized with nothing to show for it.
This could’ve been a moment to ask bigger questions—about what we owe to lab animals, to the people who study them, and to the future of science itself. Instead, it’s become a slow, quiet erasure. And no one’s really sure what happens next.
